The philosophy of this law is complex and in-depth study, which requires knowledge of the legal process in general and philosophical ideas. For centuries, the scope and nature of the law was discussed and argued about various aspects and intellectual discussion arises from a fundamental question of "what is the law." In response, some schools of thought were born of that wise laws and positivists are two of the most notable. Both camps have strongly divergent views on the role and functions of law in certain circumstances and providing a forum for discussion, criticism continues to be relevant today.
Although the laws and positivism is used frequently, it is important to remember that they cover a very wide range of academic ideas. Even in the camp are veering towards understanding more conservative or more liberal, and there also is a natural gray. Having said that, scholars and philosophers can be covered by one of the categories on the basis of certain fundamental principles in their writings and opinions.
Laws have always been linked to the consideration of the ultra-that is to say moral or spiritual influence of their understanding of how the law operates. One is that the creation of a law that could be bad at all, on the basis that the government has the authority that needs to be able to legislate morality. For this reason, natural law theory was used to justify anarchy and at ground level. This has led to criticism of the principles of natural law, which has been refined and developed to fit with modern thinking. On the flip side, the law has been used as a precise method of service, "the court for war criminals and former dictator after their reign.
A number of strong criticism of laws from positivist camp. Positivism was at the center of its belief that the law is not being affected by the moral, but the importance of considering this standard. Because morality is subject positivism suggests that this law is the source of morality and that there is no other legal considerations should be taken into consideration. Positivism has been criticized for allowing extremists and unjust law. It has been suggested that positivism in the sense strict its best, is because it ignores flaws depth and breadth of the language in the adoption of legal, which means the law positive can be read in the fire, which differ based on the meaning of words, the same difference. Despite this, positivism seen as part of a theoretical legal basis in the development of philosophy Legal modern over the past few decades and is spread through the award-winning favor academic revival contemporary.
Laws and positivism has been the subject of academic debate continues into the nature of law and its role in society. Law schools of both critics and built on one and other theories and principles to develop a greater understanding of complex legal philosopher. Although the debate is set to continue with a new generation of legal theory promises to respect natural law and positivism received widespread and close analysis of the structure of the law.
0 comments:
Post a Comment